Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti Graphics Card. Serious Gaming. Incredible Value. Step up to Ge. Force. It features an ultra- efficient next- gen architecture, as well as 2. GTX 6. 50 Ti. The GTX 7. Ti offers this amazing performance at an incredible value, making it the weapon of choice for serious gaming. ZOTAC Ge. Force GTX 1. Ti OC Edition. Des jeux fluides et rapides en Haute D. La ZOTAC Ge. Force GTX 1. Ti OC Edition sera donc une solution id. Concevez un PC Gaming peu on. Elle offre aux joueurs une exp! Cette carte graphique avanc. Les technologies Ge. Buy MSI GeForce GTX 750 Ti DirectX 11.2 N750 Ti-2GD5TLP 2GB 128-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Model Base/Boost/Mem (MHz) ASL GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB Founders Edition: 1480 / 1582 / 1376: ASUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB Founders Edition GTX1080TI-FE. How well can the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 2GB GPU run PC game system requirements? Compare GeForce GTX 960 2GB performance to game specs. Buy MSI GAMING Edition GeForce GTX 980 TI 6GB OC DirectX 12 VR READY (GTX 980TI GAMING 6G): Graphics Cards - Amazon.com FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases. Extreme dwarfs other GPUs; we’ve nicknamed ours Gargantuar. GTX 750 Ti features an ultra-efficient next-gen architecture, as well as 25% better performance and double the power efficiency of the GTX 650 Ti. Check it out. We put the 1 GHz Nvidia 950 to the test against the 1 GHz 750 Ti to find out which you should buy. Force sont exclusives et r. Elles sont con. Regardez vos jeux favoris prendre vie et s'animer avec NVIDIA Game. Works et NVIDIA G- SYNC, les innovations technologiques uniques dignent du Cin. Ensemble, ils assurent une stabilit. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Best 1. 08. 0p Graphics Card. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Enthusiast GPUs are so powerful that only those with 4. K screens or multiple monitors need to worry about spending hundreds on the latest cards. ![]() ![]() That’s great news for the rest of us because, these days, high- quality single- screen gaming doesn’t cost much more than . The Ge. Force GTX 7. Ti uses the new Maxwell architecture, which is designed to produce great framerates while drastically reducing power consumption. Performance and price comparison graphs for GeForce GTX 750 Ti. ![]() Check out the latest NVIDIA GeForce technology specifications, system requirements, and more. GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 265: If you only have £100 or so to spend, which graphics card should you buy? ![]() Nvidia’s done this by redesigning its streaming multiprocessors: instead of using huge blocks of processors, Maxwell divides them into much smaller chunks that can be deployed more efficiently. You may also like our Best SSD group test. AMD Radeon R7 2. 65. The GTX 7. 50 Ti is clocked to 1,0. MHz with an average boost of 1,0. MHz, and it’s paired with 2. GB of 1,3. 50. MHz GDDR5 memory. It’s got 6. 40 stream processors and 1. The GTX 7. 50 Ti trades blows with the AMD Radeon R7 2. Pitcairn core used in last year’s . The AMD card’s stock and boost speeds of 9. MHz and 9. 25. MHz can’t match Nvidia, but its 2. GB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1,4. MHz – and it’s got 1,0. Nvidia GTX 7. 50 Ti. Little separates these cards at the checkout. AMD’s cards are rarer, and a stock- speed model costs at least . We’ve loaded 3. DMark’s Ice Storm, Cloud Gate and Fire Strike benchmarks to determine each card’s theoretical power, and we’ve locked and loaded the Unigine Heaven test to further evaluate raw power. Cinebench R1. 5’s Open. GL benchmark tests each card’s abilities with GPU- heavy workloads, and PC Mark 8 uses Home and Creative workload benchmarks to judge application performance. GPU overclocking is easier than ever, so we’ve given both of these cards a boost. Both cards were only tested at quoted speeds if they remained stable throughout all tests. We’ve also measured idle and peak temperatures, and the idle and peak power requirements of our test rig, which comprises of an Asus X7. Deluxe motherboard, Intel Core i. X processor, 1. 6GB of RAM and a 1. TB hard disk. Looking to spend more? Try our Radeon R9 2. X vs Ge. Force GTX 7. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Battlefield 4. AMD Radeon R7 2. Nvidia Ge. Force GTX 7. TIMinimum. Average. Minimum. Average. Battlefield 4, High at 1. Battlefield 4, Ultra at 1. There was only one winner in Battlefield 4. In the High- quality benchmark the AMD’s minimum and average framerates of 4. Nvidia – the former figure was nine frames ahead, and the latter was almost seven frames faster. The gap closed at Ultra quality, but the red team still dominated. AMD’s 2. 9fps minimum was only one frame short of a playable 3. Nvidia card was five frames worse – and the R7 2. GTX 7. 50 Ti. The AMD card’s better minimum framerate result is of particular importance, as it means the game won’t judder mid- game. It’s no surprise AMD took an early lead – Battlefield 4 is a flagship title from AMD’s in- house gaming programme, so the firm’s engineers will have visited DICE and optimised the game for Radeon cards. Best for Battlefield 4. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Bioshock Infinite. AMD Radeon R7 2. 65. Nvidia Ge. Force GTX 7. TIMinimum. Average. Minimum. Average. Bioshock Infinite: V. High at 1. 08. 0p. Bioshock Infinite Ultra at 1. AMD continued its good form in Bioshock Infinite – a modern game that’s very scalable, in part thanks to its console- friendly development. At Very High settings both cards had no trouble, but the R7 2. GTX 7. 50 Ti’s 6. The R7 2. 65’s minimum of 3. Nvidia. Its minimum framerate of 1. We cranked the detail up to Ultra and both cards remained playable: the R7 2. Nvidia at 4. 6. 3. Nvidia’s hardware still languished with a minimum framerate of 1. AMD card slipped to a 1. It’s another AMD victory, but the R7 2. Best for Bioshock Infinite. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Crysis 3. AMD Radeon R7 2. Nvidia Ge. Force GTX 7. TIMinimum. Average. Minimum. Average. Crysis 3: High at 1. Crysis 3: Very High at 1. Crytek’s latest shooter is the most demanding title here, and it’s another game that’s been tweaked by AMD’s engineers. At High settings the R7 2. The Nvidia card wasn’t as smooth, with a fine average of 3. The situation worsened for Nvidia at Very High settings. Neither card hit 3. AMD GPU was better – and the R7 2. GTX 7. 50 Ti’s 2. SEE ALSO: Xbox One vs PS4. Best for Crysis 3. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Batman: Arkham Origins. AMD Radeon R7 2. 65. Nvidia Ge. Force GTX 7. TIMinimum. Average. Minimum. Average. Arkham Origins: Very High at 1. Batman is a new game for our graphics card testing, and it’s the only title to veer from AMD dominance. It’s part of Nvidia’s The Way It’s Meant To Be Played programme, so it’s optimised for the green team’s hardware; it’s no surprise this was the GTX 7. Ti’s best test. The GTX 7. Ti’s minimum of 4. R7 2. 65’s 1. 2fps – the AMD card’s figure will manifest itself as stuttering. Both cards recorded averages of 5. Nvidia’s maximum framerate of 8. AMD’s 7. 9fps. Nvidia’s optimisations clearly work: the GTX 7. Ti has a smooth minimum framerate an excellent average. Best for Batman: Arkham Origins. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Theoretical Gaming Tests. AMD Radeon R7 2. 65. Nividia Ge. Force GTX 7. TIMinimum. Average. Minimum. Average. Unigine Extreme at 1. D Mark Fire Strike (Graphics)4. D Mark Cloud Gate (Graphics)3. D Mark Ice Storm (Graphics)2. These tests illustrate the theoretical power of each GPU, and they confirmed what our real- world testing had already shown: the R7 2. Its average of 2. Unigine Heaven outpaced Nvidia’s 1. AMD card’s minimum and maximum scores of 1. GTX 7. 50 Ti’s 1. R7 2. 65 had more legs than its rival. The R7 2. 65 took the overall crown in all three 3. DMark benchmarks, with the most significant victory coming in the Fire Strike test. This is the most demanding 3. DMark run, with the R7 2. Nvidia’s 3,9. 26. The GTX 7. 50 Ti outpaced the R7 2. Cloud Gate and Ice Storm physics tests, although the gap was always slim – and, in the tougher Fire Strike test, AMD took back the lead. Best in Theoretical Gaming Tests. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Theoretical Application Tests. AMD Radeon R7 2. 65. Nividia Ge. Force GTX 7. TICinebench R1. 5 (Open. GL)9. 9. 0. 1 fps. PC Mark 8 Home. 4,3. PC Mark 8 Creative. The GTX 7. 50 Ti’s factory- fresh Maxwell architecture took a surprising lead in Cinebench with an impressive score of 1. R7 2. 65 squeezed in behind with 9. The R7 2. 65 took back ground in PC Mark 8’s tests, which evaluate application performance. The Home test simulates web browsing, word processing, gaming, photo- editing and video chat, so it’s a good indication of general performance. Here, AMD’s card took the lead with 4,3. GTX 7. 50 Ti. The gap widened in PC Mark’s Creative test, which includes photo editing, video editing and media transcoding tests alongside group video chat, gaming and web browsing. The AMD card’s increased ability showed, scoring an impressive 4,9. GTX 7. 50 Ti’s 4,1. Best in Application Tests. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Power, Heat and Noise. AMD Radeon R7 2. 65. Nividia Ge. Force GTX 7. TIIdle. Peak. Idle. Peak. Power Consumption. Watts. 26. 6 Watts. Watts. 16. 9 Watts. Temperature. 37. C7. C3. 4C6. 6C. There’s no doubting of Maxwell’s efficiency improvements: our test rig’s idle power consumption of 7. W is a little lower than the R7 2. W score, but the GTX 7. Ti rig pulled just 1. W from the mains when the GPU was stress- tested at 1. W less than the R7 2. The fact that Nvidia’s hardware is playable in almost every game while consuming so little power is impressive, and it makes AMD’s rebadged hardware look decidedly old- hat. The GTX 7. 50 Ti continued its good form in temperature tests, where its top temperature of 6. Neither card is too hot, but the big difference here is power consumption – and Maxwell is far more efficient than AMD’s older part. Best for Effeciency. Ge. Force GTX 7. 50 Ti vs Radeon R7 2. Overclocking. Nvidia hasn’t done well so far, but that changed when we overclocked: the GTX 7. Ti returned spectacular results. Maxwell has already proved frugal, and it’s got huge headroom: we added 2. MHz to both the core and the memory clocks without any instability, which is a huge boost for any graphics card. We overclocked the R7 2. MHz and its memory by 1. MHz, but neither AMD’s driver nor MSI Afterburner allowed further tweaks. The GTX 7. 50 Ti’s extra speed saw it overhaul the AMD card in Nvidia- optimised title Batman: Arkham Origins. The GTX 7. 50 Ti’s average improved from 5. AMD average. The Nvidia’s minimum framerate of 5. R7 2. 65’s revised 1. Nvidia also overtook AMD in Bioshock Infinite – but only just. The Nvidia chip’s new 6. Radeon, but the R7 2. Ti could manage. In two other games tests Nvidia closed the gap, but couldn’t quite catch up. The overclocked R7 2. Battlefield 4 with a playable 3. GTX 7. 50 Ti was four frames behind in both tests. In Crysis 3, the Radeon averaged 3. Nvidia’s 3. 0. 0. We only saw minor improvements from both cards in Unigine Heaven, with AMD still leading, and the Radeon maintained its lead in 3. D Mark Fire Strike – the R7 2. Nvidia remained better in Cinebench R1. PC Mark 8. There was little movement in thermal benchmarks: the R7 2. W, while the Maxwell card remained impressively low at 1. WFor pure overclocking, Nvidia wins. Maxwell has much more headroom than its AMD rival, and our stable 2. MHz tweaks saw the GTX 7. Ti beat the R7 2. AMD. Best for Overclocking. Other Things to Consider. The cards we’ve tested are standard designs, and the market will be flooded by cards with a combination of enhancements, from overclocked cores and extra memory to passive or low- profile coolers. Right now, Nvidia leads the way. Its GTX 7. 50 Ti has been out longer, so there’s plenty of choice: the most powerful third- party card available at the moment boosts the core from 1,0. MHz to 1,2. 02. MHz – another huge leap. Most current third- party cards concentrate on overclocks, and they’re larger dual- fan models that stretch around 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2017
Categories |